Should the sale of junk food in school canteens be banned?
According to Jemma Smith (2005), the term ‘junk food’ refers to any food that is perceived to be unhealthy and of low nutritional value. The issue of junk food in schools has been raised when it is being accused for leading to the increase in childhood obesity. ‘The nutritional value of food eaten by Australian children has been falling progressively over the past 30 years’ (Tran 2005, p. 6). Accordingly, I strongly agree that the sale of junk food in school canteens should be banned as it will degrade students’ health level, cause behavioural problems as well as create litter problems in the school compound.
First, junk food is indisputably bad for health. Most of the junk foods are of low nutritional value. For instance, chips, confectionery, soft drinks and hamburgers contain a high level of fat, salt and sugar which could aggravate the health of schoolchildren (Health Foundation 2005). Besides, junk food generally contains chemical additives such as synthetic flavour and colour enhancers. According to Weekend News (2005), junk foods like instant noodles and chocolate bars have the potential to raise the kilojoules intake and subsequently bring to weight gain. That is why a lot of complaints on childhood obesity have been directed at junk food as it could contribute to further health problems such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and even cancers. Furthermore, the decline in the dental health of Australian primary school children acts as a significant evidence that the health level is worsening (Weekend News 2005, p. 6). Hence, the sale of junk food in school should be banned as it is unhealthy for schoolchildren.
In addition, additives from the junk food have been proven to trigger behavioural problems, for examples, hyperactivity and poor concentration amongst children (Smith 2005). In fact, students’ learning potential is reduced when junk food is sold in schools. According to the website ‘The Food Show’ (2005), there is a response from Jack Green who mentions that an obvious improvement in students’ attitudes has been noticed when the school removed the sale of junk food. He points out that the students became calmer after lunch. Ergo, the sale of junk food in school canteens should be banned in order to cut down the behavioural problems in children.
Apart from that, fast food packaging is the major contributor to litter problems (Smith 2005). Subsequently, it will not only burden the cleaning costs but also downgrade the image of the communities for the rationale that litter is a safety and health hazard. Moreover, in a response by Jack Green in ‘The Food Show’ website (2005), he states that litter such as cans, crisp packets, cartons and plastic containers are everywhere when junk food is sold in school. As a result, the school grounds man has no much time to spend on maintenance projects that benefit the school as he has to spend the time on cleaning the grounds. Overall, the sale of junk food has to be banned to reduce the litter problems in school.
All in all, I strongly assent to the ban of selling junk food in school canteens as it will worsen the health of students, cause behavioural problems as well as create litter problems in the school compound. Despite it shows an apparent decline for the canteen profits at Cook High School after reducing the sale of junk foods (School News 2005), this should never be the excuse to make junk food available in school canteens. In brief, school authorities should put the welfare and safety of students in precedence by banning the sale of junk food in school canteens.
According to Jemma Smith (2005), the term ‘junk food’ refers to any food that is perceived to be unhealthy and of low nutritional value. The issue of junk food in schools has been raised when it is being accused for leading to the increase in childhood obesity. ‘The nutritional value of food eaten by Australian children has been falling progressively over the past 30 years’ (Tran 2005, p. 6). Accordingly, I strongly agree that the sale of junk food in school canteens should be banned as it will degrade students’ health level, cause behavioural problems as well as create litter problems in the school compound.
First, junk food is indisputably bad for health. Most of the junk foods are of low nutritional value. For instance, chips, confectionery, soft drinks and hamburgers contain a high level of fat, salt and sugar which could aggravate the health of schoolchildren (Health Foundation 2005). Besides, junk food generally contains chemical additives such as synthetic flavour and colour enhancers. According to Weekend News (2005), junk foods like instant noodles and chocolate bars have the potential to raise the kilojoules intake and subsequently bring to weight gain. That is why a lot of complaints on childhood obesity have been directed at junk food as it could contribute to further health problems such as heart disease, osteoarthritis and even cancers. Furthermore, the decline in the dental health of Australian primary school children acts as a significant evidence that the health level is worsening (Weekend News 2005, p. 6). Hence, the sale of junk food in school should be banned as it is unhealthy for schoolchildren.
In addition, additives from the junk food have been proven to trigger behavioural problems, for examples, hyperactivity and poor concentration amongst children (Smith 2005). In fact, students’ learning potential is reduced when junk food is sold in schools. According to the website ‘The Food Show’ (2005), there is a response from Jack Green who mentions that an obvious improvement in students’ attitudes has been noticed when the school removed the sale of junk food. He points out that the students became calmer after lunch. Ergo, the sale of junk food in school canteens should be banned in order to cut down the behavioural problems in children.
Apart from that, fast food packaging is the major contributor to litter problems (Smith 2005). Subsequently, it will not only burden the cleaning costs but also downgrade the image of the communities for the rationale that litter is a safety and health hazard. Moreover, in a response by Jack Green in ‘The Food Show’ website (2005), he states that litter such as cans, crisp packets, cartons and plastic containers are everywhere when junk food is sold in school. As a result, the school grounds man has no much time to spend on maintenance projects that benefit the school as he has to spend the time on cleaning the grounds. Overall, the sale of junk food has to be banned to reduce the litter problems in school.
All in all, I strongly assent to the ban of selling junk food in school canteens as it will worsen the health of students, cause behavioural problems as well as create litter problems in the school compound. Despite it shows an apparent decline for the canteen profits at Cook High School after reducing the sale of junk foods (School News 2005), this should never be the excuse to make junk food available in school canteens. In brief, school authorities should put the welfare and safety of students in precedence by banning the sale of junk food in school canteens.
Generally, your essay is well structured and well supported your stance. The introduction paragraph clearly pointed out the main subject of the question. Besides, the conclusion also directly linked to the question. All main controlling ideas are included, together with appropriate examples. Overall, the sentences are well synthesised and easy to understand. In addition, the citations and quatations are well written and you have made full use on the articles given. However, you tend to focus on 1 paragraph. This make your the easay's structure not very attractive. Many information are provided in 1st paragraph as compared to the rest. Nice grammar and vocabularies.
ReplyDelete